2
Hurricanes as Agents of Cultural Change
Integrating Paleotempestology and the Archaeological Record
Matthew C. Peros, Jago Cooper, and Frank Oliva
Abstract
Hurricanes are major meteorological events with significant impacts in tropical and extra-tropical regions worldwide. Despite this, little research has been undertaken on the effects of hurricanes and other intense storms on pre-industrial societies. New evidence from the field of paleotempestology—the study of past hurricane activity using geological proxy techniques, such as lagoon sediments and speleothems—is shedding light on how hurricanes varied over the Holocene in terms of frequency, geographic distribution, and magnitude. This information, in conjunction with archaeological data from coastal locations, provides a means to better understand human adaptation and resilience in the face of abrupt, high-magnitude climatic events. This chapter highlights three examples where paleotempestology has been (or could be) important at helping us understand past societal responses to hurricane activity: (1) the case of the destruction of the fleets of the Kublai Khan in medieval Japan, (2) the possible effect of hurricanes during the Terminal Maya collapse, and (3) proactive hurricane adaptation strategies at a Taíno site in northern Cuba. These examples show that human responses to hurricane events have varied considerably and highlight ways paleotempestology can be better integrated with archaeological data.
Hurricanes are short-duration, high-magnitude non-biotic agents whose impacts can have devastating consequences for coastal communities and ecosystems. The 2017 hurricane season in the North Atlantic was particularly severe, consisting of seventeen named storms (including Hurricane Irma, which had one of the highest recorded surface wind speeds of any hurricane of all time) that left thousands of people dead and hundreds of billions of dollars in damage (Blake 2018:28). Considerable scientific effort is focused on understanding how hurricane activity will change with global warming, with models generally indicating that the intensity of the strongest storms will increase in the coming decades (Camargo 2013; Knutson et al. 2010). Other recent research has focused on how hurricane activity impacts cultural heritage in coastal regions (Rivera-Collazo 2019). However, there is comparatively little research on how hurricanes impacted pre-industrial societies and how those societies responded or adapted to these events (Cooper 2013:44; Medina-Elizalde et al. 2016). In part, this is due to a lack of reliable data on hurricane activity prior to the instrumental record, but it may also be due to challenges associated with integrating geological and archaeological datasets at different spatial and temporal scales (Stein 1993). Nevertheless, the frequency with which hurricanes occur and the intense rainfall, wind activity, and flooding associated with them (e.g., Murty et al. 1986) means they likely had considerable influence in many coastal regions.
The archaeological literature contains numerous examples of natural phenomena that affected pre-industrial societies, such as volcanic eruptions (e.g., Dull et al. 2001), earthquakes (e.g., Florin and Gerrard 2017), riverine floods (e.g., Muñoz et al. 2015), droughts (e.g., Hodell et al. 1995), and tsunamis (e.g., Bruins et al. 2009; Reinhardt et al. 2006). Hurricanes differ from many of these other phenomena due to their quasi-predictable nature: they virtually always occur in summer and late fall when sea surface temperatures are highest (Emanuel 2003). This is in contrast to earthquakes and tsunamis, for example, whose timing is largely unpredictable due to the apparently random nature of seismic activity. In addition, hurricanes occur with sufficient frequency that individuals living in hurricane-sensitive regions may encounter multiple events during their lifetimes. With the possible exception of floods, this also stands in contrast to many other natural phenomena (e.g., volcanoes), which recur at intervals that can easily exceed several centuries (Deligne et al. 2010). Due to the seasonality and frequency of hurricanes, one specific element of community adaptation that may be important relates to the concepts of anticipation and learning, which can result in policies to reduce risk and increase community resilience (Gunderson 2010). Thus, hurricanes represent a unique opportunity to examine societal responses, adaptation, and resilience in the face of high-magnitude natural stressors (e.g., Holling and Gunderson 2002).
While hurricanes are natural phenomena over which humans have essentially no control, the severity of hurricane impacts is highly influenced by human activity. Hurricanes become hazards when they encounter and affect human populations, and they can turn into natural disasters if a large number of fatalities or overwhelming damage occurs (Burton et al. 1978). Conversely, human intervention can ensure that the effects of hurricanes are limited and that they do not become disasters (Pielke et al. 2003:101). Impacts can be mitigated through the temporary relocation of people (i.e., evacuation; Huang et al. 2012:285), the construction of household architecture that can withstand severe winds and flooding and can be efficiently rebuilt (Stewart et al. 2003), the construction of settlements in protected areas or the building of flood protection itself (e.g., levees; Cooper and Peros 2010:1229; Merrell et al. 2011), and food procurement strategies that provide a range of resources to buttress against sudden disruptions to the local economy (Cooper 2012:105). Thus, hurricanes as natural disasters are both naturally and socially constructed, especially when social systems fail or are not in place to limit potential damage (Brunsma et al. 2007:34).
The purpose of this chapter is to assess the importance of hurricanes as agents of cultural change in archaeological contexts by reviewing examples in the archaeological and geological literature of past human responses to hurricane activity. To do this, we begin by introducing the field of paleotempestology, a rapidly growing area of research focused on the use of geological proxy data to document prehistoric hurricane activity. We then consider three examples in which paleotempestology has played (or could play) a role in elucidating how hurricanes influenced pre-industrial societies: medieval Japan, the Classic Maya in the Yucatán, and the Taíno in the Caribbean. Hurricanes provide a distinct opportunity to examine unidirectional environmental-human interactions: hurricanes impact humans, and humans—with the possible exception of contemporary global warming (e.g., Knutson et al. 2010)—do not affect hurricanes. However, this does not mean that the only human response to hurricanes is reactive, as there are examples of proactive responses that appear in the archaeological record as well (e.g., Cooper and Peros 2010).
Hurricanes and Paleotempestology
Hurricanes are rotating, organized systems of clouds and thunderstorms that originate over tropical or subtropical waters and which have a closed, low-level circulation with sustained minimum wind speeds of 119 kph or higher (NOAA 2018). At a global scale, these severe weather events are referred to as tropical cyclones, but they are called hurricanes in the North Atlantic and East Pacific Oceans, typhoons in the western North Pacific, and cyclones in the southern West Pacific and Indian Oceans (NOAA 2018). The global distribution of hurricanes (in this chapter, the term hurricane will refer to all tropical cyclones, unless otherwise indicated) shows that they form between 5° and 15° north and south of the Equator and generally track westward before recurving toward the right in the northern hemisphere and left in the southern hemisphere (figure 2.1; Goni et al. 2009). Warm sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and low vertical wind shear (i.e., change in wind direction with altitude) are critical for hurricanes to form and sustain themselves (Corbosiero and Molinari 2002). Because of this, hurricanes are most common and intense in August and September in the northern hemisphere when SSTs are at their maximum (Emanuel 2003:79). Hurricanes continue their tracks until they make landfall or encounter colder water, which diminishes their source of energy (Emanuel 2003:78).
The study of paleotempestology is not just a way to understand human responses to severe weather events; it provides the only way to establish long-term climate records of the kind necessary for understanding the relationship between hurricane activity and Holocene climate change. Reliable and systematic monitoring of hurricane activity only began at the end of World War II, which has hindered the development of reliable, long-term (decadal- to millennial-scale) datasets that record past hurricane tracks, intensities, frequencies, and impacts. Prior to the twentieth century, the documentation of hurricanes was less consistent and many storms were probably never recorded, especially if they did not make landfall (Emanuel 2003:76). In some cases, archival sources have been used to extend the instrumental record and fill data gaps; early Spanish archival documents, for example, have provided evidence for hurricane activity in the Caribbean beginning as early as June 25, 1494, at Isabella, Dominican Republic (García-Herrera et al. 2007:55), and a 1,000-year-long record of hurricane strikes has been developed using local gazettes (i.e., newspapers) in southern China (Liu et al. 2001). While these and other studies highlight the utility of archival sources for reconstructing past hurricane activity, they also indicate that many storms are also likely to have been unreported, especially as one goes back farther in time (Liu et al. 2001:461).
Over the past few decades, the field of paleotempestology—the study of past hurricane activity using geological proxy techniques—has attempted to fill many of the gaps present in the instrumental and historical records and also to extend these datasets back thousands of years (Oliva et al. 2017; Wallace et al. 2014). The most common proxy indicators include sedimentary sources, usually from coastal lakes and lagoons (e.g., Liu and Fearn 2000; Donnelly et al. 2001), along with isotopes of oxygen measured on speleothems (Frappier et al. 2007), corals (Hetzinger et al. 2008), and tree rings (Trouet et al. 2016; Miller et al. 2006). The basic premise behind sedimentary indicators is that hurricane-driven storm surges and wave activity transport coarse-grained sediment eroded from the shoreline into coastal lakes and deposit this sediment as flooding recedes (Donnelly et al. 2004; Liu 2004). These “over-wash” layers are characterized by a sandy texture that differs from the finer-grained sediments that are deposited during normal, low-energy conditions. By taking sediment cores at these sites and dating organic matter present in the sediments, it is possible to use sand layers to identify the presence of past hurricane strikes over hundreds or even thousands of years (Donnelly and Woodruff 2007).
Despite significant progress in the field of paleotempestology, there are still limitations in terms of spatial and temporal coverage as well as with the method itself. A recent meta-analysis of paleotempestological reconstructions for the North Atlantic Basin shows that their spatial distribution is relatively uneven (figure 2.2; Oliva et al. 2017). While there is a high density of data points from sites on the northern coast of the Gulf of Mexico and the East Coast of the United States, there are relatively few records for much of the Caribbean and the East Coast of Central America, even though the latter regions are known for frequent hurricanes. In terms of the length of the records, most reconstructions cover only the last few thousand years, meaning that our understanding of hurricane variability prior to this time is unclear (figure 2.2; Oliva et al. 2017). In addition, paleotempestological reconstructions are generally reliable at recording hurricane frequency (e.g., Donnelly et al. 2015) but are less reliable at documenting hurricane intensity, since it is difficult to determine whether a given over-wash layer was formed by a more intense hurricane that struck farther away from the coring site or a less powerful storm that was a direct hit (Woodruff et al. 2008). However, progress is being made in addressing many of these limitations through analyses of different proxy indicators (e.g., speleothems, tree rings, and corals) and the modeling of storm surges and how they affect sediment transport (e.g., Woodruff et al. 2008).
Hurricane Impacts and the Archaeological Record
Hurricanes have the potential to impact human societies and the environment in a variety of ways. During hurricane landfall, damage can result from high winds, hurricane-induced tornadoes, and waves and storm surges that cause marine flooding and excessive rainfall. In the days and weeks that follow the event, additional impacts can include inland flooding (from the rainfall), the salinization of freshwater resources, fires due to the preponderance of natural and anthropogenic flammable debris, and a general disruption of local ecosystem services on which people depend (Sandifer et al. 2017). We now consider three examples of pre-industrial human responses to some of these impacts, with “response” in this case broadly defined as how people reacted to the events (Adger et al. 2013:113).
Medieval Japan: Destruction
In a study from the western Pacific, paleotempestological evidence was used to independently verify historical accounts of two “Kamikaze” typhoons that were said to have divinely struck southern Japan in the thirteenth century CE and in so doing destroyed the fleets of the Kublai Khan, whose vast armada had set out to conquer Japan (Woodruff et al. 2014). Legends state that despite being significantly outnumbered, the Japanese defenses were saved by the fortuitous destruction of the Mongol fleets by intense typhoons occurring in November 1274 CE and August 1281 CE, respectively (Sasaki 2008). Noting that some historical accounts can be prone to exaggeration, Jonathan D. Woodruff and colleagues (2014) attempted to assess the presence and possibly the magnitude of these typhoons.
The researchers began by analyzing the most recent sediments in a coastal lake in the region where the ships were supposed to have landed and correlating distinctive sedimentary layers found there against known typhoon strikes that occurred during the last 100 years. These “modern analogues” helped establish a unique sedimentary signature for typhoons in the area. Then, the authors identified two prominent sand layers in cores collected in the lake that dated to the thirteenth century CE (Woodruff et al. 2014). These layers were very similar to the ones left by the twentieth-century typhoons and were also enriched in the element strontium, an indictor of marine sediment over-wash. These data strongly suggested that two major marine flooding events occurred around the time the historical records indicate the fleets were destroyed.
Woodruff and colleagues (2014) argue that it is impossible to unequivocally link the geochemical and sedimentological data to the typhoon events, in part due to the precision of radiocarbon dating, which typically produces ages within a range of a few decades. Still, they argue that the most likely explanation for the sand layers is the Kamikaze typhoons, due to their timing and a lack of evidence for any other natural event that could have produced a similar deposit (such as a tsunami). Their work then places the two typhoon strikes into a broader paleoclimatic context and shows that this period—the thirteenth century—was one in which more typhoons were steered toward southern Japan by changes in El Niño activity in the tropical Pacific Ocean.
The authors thus argue that the typhoons serve as an example of how past events of extreme weather associated with climatic change appear to have had significant geopolitical influence (Woodruff et al. 2014). In this particular case, the impacts were severe, and the response was one of destruction and dispersal of the Mongol fleets—likely due to a combination of high wind, rain, and wave activity. While their study represents an example of the effects of hurricane impacts, it illustrates how geological data can be integrated with the historical record to assess the magnitude of natural events that had significant impacts on humans.
The typhoon strikes in the Japanese historical example also illustrate the concept of vulnerability—the degree to which natural and/or human systems are susceptible to, and unable to cope with, adverse impacts of climate change (IPCC 2014:54). The scale of the destruction indicates that the Kublai Khan’s fleets must have been highly vulnerable and leads to questions concerning the quality of the ships and the degree to which disaster preparedness and mitigation was included in the invasion planning. For example, in both cases, the fleets were destroyed in late summer/autumn of 1274 and 1281 CE, respectively, which is the height of typhoon season in the western Pacific. To what extent was seasonality considered when the invasions were planned? Following the destruction of the first armada in 1274 CE, what was done to limit potential typhoon impacts during the second invasion in 1281 CE? Whatever the answers, both events are examples of human systems being overwhelmed by natural phenomena.
The geological evidence itself provides only the starting point for understanding the human response to typhoon activity. The paleotempestological data produced by Woodruff and colleagues (2014) validate and refine the historical accounts of two high-magnitude typhoons occurring around the time of the destructions of the Mongol fleets. But understanding the nature of the impacts themselves requires data from historical and archaeological sources. For example, underwater excavations led by Kenzo Hayashida of the Kyushu Okinawa Society for Underwater Archaeology have produced at least one of the Khan’s ships and a range of maritime-related material culture (Delgado 2003). While it is now believed that the size of the Khan’s armada was probably exaggerated (Delgado 2010), the archaeological evidence is consistent with historical reports of the incident and geological evidence of the storms themselves.
Finally, the typhoon strikes must qualify as natural disasters, due to infrastructure damage and lives lost (Burton et al. 1978). However, this also is an example of the idea of natural disasters being relative to the actors impacted by the event. From the point of view of the Japanese, the Kamikaze typhoons and their impacts were seen as “divine winds” that essentially saved their civilization, whereas these events could only have been viewed as disasters from the perspective of the Mongols. While most natural disasters are typically considered to have negative consequences for human systems, it suggests that the concept of natural disaster can be more nuanced and can occasionally produce positive outcomes as well. Examples include the creation of opportunities for upgrading infrastructure and the stimulation of economic growth (e.g., Hallegatte and Dumas 2009), as well as the political and social opportunities for urban renewal (see Pickett, chapter 4, this volume).
The Maya Realm: Destabilizing Force or Unlikely Benefit?
The Caribbean coast of Central America experiences frequent hurricanes, many of which have had devastating consequences for people in both coastal and inland areas. Hurricane Mitch, for example, struck the coast of Honduras in late October 1998 and resulted in more than 11,000 deaths and billions of dollars in damage, much of it due to heavy rainfall that caused severe mudslides in interior mountainous regions (Hellin et al. 1999). In addition, in August 2007, Hurricane Dean struck the Yucátan coast of Mexico as a category 5 storm. Despite causing over $1.6 billion in damage, fatalities from this hurricane were relatively low, with only forty-five deaths recorded in the Caribbean islands and fewer than two dozen in Mexico. This relatively low death toll was attributed in part to reliable forecasts of the hurricane’s track and effective warning and evacuation procedures (Franklin 2008).
The frequency of high-intensity hurricanes affecting Central America prompts the obvious question: what impacts did these storms have on pre-industrial people, in particular the ancient Maya, with their sophisticated cities and intricate political alliances? The answer, however, is not entirely clear, in part because of limited paleotempestological research done in the region (although see McCloskey and Keller 2009; Denommee et al. 2014) but also because the effects of hurricanes would have certainly varied given the region’s topographic heterogeneity and diverse landscapes and cultures.
Some of the earliest work examining this question argued that hurricanes may have been “trigger mechanisms” for configurations of settlement patterns, subsistence strategies, warfare, trade, and migrations and demographic stability (Konrad 1985). As a result, “The hurricane was an integral feature of the pre-Hispanic Maya cosmology and ecological paradigm” in the first millennium CE (Konrad 1996:99). Herman W. Konrad (116–120) also argued that the presence of hurricanes led to local adaptations, such as household architecture characterized by rounded roofs and walls—features that are common along the Yucátan coast—that would have better withstood the impact of hurricane-force winds (123). More recently, others have argued that hurricanes were a destabilizing force for the ancient Maya and may have precipitated episodes of warfare (Dunning and Houston 2011:64). While some evidence—in the form of epigraphic, iconographic, and geoarchaeological data—exists to support this view (Dunning and Houston 2011), links between hurricane impacts and the ancient Maya are still mostly tentative.
One notable example of the effects of hurricanes on ancient Mayan civilization involves their possible role in the Terminal Maya collapse. This event, which occurred around 900 CE, has been attributed to a number of interrelated factors, including a series of severe droughts (Hodell et al. 1995). Martín Medina-Elizalde and Eelco J. Rohling (2012) analyzed four high-resolution paleoclimatic records (including one stalagmite and three lake sediment records) for the Yucátan Peninsula and concluded that droughts coincident with the Terminal Maya collapse were driven largely by a reduced frequency and intensity of hurricanes (as well as tropical depressions and other storms). Moreover, they argue that the groundwater table in the Yucátan Peninsula is particularly sensitive to tropical storm frequency and that only a modest reduction in these events would be necessary to explain the drought signal present in isotopic records for the region (958).
The hypothesis of hurricane reduction as a trigger for the Terminal Maya collapse has been challenged by Amy B. Frappier and colleagues (2014), who developed a stalagmite-based paleotempestological reconstruction for the northern Yucátan focused on mud layers incorporated into the stalagmite matrix as an indicator of hurricane-induced flood events in a cave. After calibrating recent mud layers to historical hurricanes, it was shown that the Terminal Classic droughts may have coincided with normal or even enhanced hurricane activity and that the severity of the reduction in precipitation during the Maya droughts may have been overestimated (Frappier et al. 2014:5155). Moreover, the study also concludes that hurricane flood events are likely underrepresented in stalagmites at times when droughts do occur, underscoring the complexity of interpreting these records and highlighting the need for more research in this area.
Coupled with the uncertainty concerning the frequency and intensity of hurricanes during the Terminal Maya collapse is the question of what specific effects hurricanes would have had on Maya civilization given the heterogeneous topography of the region. Hurricane activity has been cited as inherently destructive (Dunning and Houston 2011), especially in low-elevation areas such as the Belize coastal plain (Dunning et al. 2012). Medina-Elizalde and colleagues (2016), however, argue that hurricanes could potentially have had “beneficial” attributes, particularly by delivering precipitation to areas that might be drought-sensitive. While hurricane rainfall typically resulted in short, high-intensity bursts that may have damaged field-based agriculture, such storms would have replenished much-needed domestic freshwater supplies that also supported household gardens (see Dine et al., chapter 7, this volume). Moreover, the effects of hurricanes would likely have been different depending on whether settlements were inland or coastal, as sites in the latter locations would be sensitive to the effects of storm surges in addition to rainfall and wind.
The role of hurricanes in ancient Maya civilization requires additional research focused on new paleotempestological data from a range of sources and proxy indicators, including established sedimentological techniques based on the analysis of over-wash layers from coastal lakes and wetlands (Liu and Fearn 2000), geochemical and sedimentological analyses of sediments from cenotes and other karst features that have recently been shown to record past hurricane variability (Brown et al. 2014), speleothem data recording flood events (Frappier et al. 2014) as well as isotopic signals of hurricane rainfall (Medina-Elizalde and Rohling 2012), and tree rings that incorporate isotopically lighter hurricane water into the plant cellulose (Miller et al. 2006). The use of a range of data sources is especially important to document hurricane impacts at non-coastal sites, so that the effects of hurricanes at some of the larger urban centers, located in interior regions, can be better resolved.
The Taíno at Los Buchillones: Proactive Resistance
Ethnohistorical sources reveal that the Taíno, who occupied much of the Greater Antilles at the time of Spanish arrival, had a sophisticated knowledge of hurricanes. Specifically, they sequenced the event into successive stages that included the coming of the winds, the destructive force of the hurricane, and post-hurricane impacts (Cooper 2013:45). Each of these stages was represented by the deities Gatauba, Guabancex, and Coatrisque, respectively (Pané 1990), indicating the extent to which the knowledge and understanding of hurricanes was ingrained in their worldview (Schwartz 2015:8). Indeed, while there is some confusion over the origin of the Spanish word huracán—which later became the English word hurricane (6)—many sources believe it ultimately derived from “Juracán,” the Taíno zemi (or deity) for disorder and chaos who also controlled the weather. Given the close cosmological relationship between hurricanes and Taíno society (8), it is not surprising that the Taíno (especially those living in coastal locations) would be well prepared to deal with these events, both physically and psychologically.
The details of Taíno resilience can be evaluated at Los Buchillones, a site occupied between about 1220 and 1640 CE on the north coast of central Cuba (figure 2.3a, b; Calvera Roses et al. 2006; Valcárcel Rojas et al. 2006). The site is presently located under approximately 1 m of water in a lagoon and offshore of a narrow sand barrier. Due to the submerged nature of the site, excavations at Los Buchillones are undertaken by building a sandbag dyke around the area of interest and then pumping out the entrapped water (figure 2.3c). Having lowered the water level and removed surficial sediments, archaeologists have recovered a range of archaeological materials—including the remains of approximately forty collapsed Taíno houses, complete with rafters, thatch, and structural posts driven into the earth (figure 2.3d). The excavations also have yielded well-preserved carved wood (figure 2.3e), in addition to chipped stone and groundstone, shell, and ceramics (Calvera Roses et al. 2006), making Los Buchillones one of the largest and best-preserved Precolumbian settlements in the Caribbean.
Geoarchaeological investigations at the site consisted of the collection of a series of sediment cores in a shore-parallel transect through the archaeological remains to determine why the site was submerged (Peros et al. 2006). Based on these investigations, we developed a model for the evolution of the coastline indicating that the village was likely built over water rather than on dry land—a settlement strategy uncommon among Taíno sites (Curet 1992). Worldwide, the reasons for building settlements on pile dwellings vary and can include better access to marine, lagoonal, and terrestrial resources (Peros et al. 2006). However, at Los Buchillones, the nature of the coastal environment and the active hurricane region the site is located in suggest that measures to adapt to this dynamic environment may have played a role in influencing settlement location and domestic architecture at the site.
Los Buchillones is located on the mainland of Cuba, inside a long and wide archipelago of cayes and mangrove islands (figure 2.3b). The tidal range at the site is comparatively small, due to the damping effect of this offshore reef. On a daily basis, the effect of the reef would mitigate tides, but it would also protect against storm surges during a hurricane (Cooper 2013). Indeed, Hurricane Irma struck the area as a category 5 event in September 2017, and anecdotal evidence indicates that most of the destruction from flooding and wind occurred on the outer reef and that the mainland was much less affected. In addition, a network of limestone caves is located approximately 1 km south of Los Buchillones, which would provide hurricane shelters; Precolumbian artifacts found in these caves indicate their use, or at least knowledge of their location, by Precolumbian populations (Cooper 2012). Thus, at the settlement scale, the physical location of Los Buchillones appears to be well suited to mitigate hurricane risk.
The design of the domestic architecture at Los Buchillones may also have been made with hurricanes in mind. The strategy of pile dwellings (figure 2.3f) would have guarded against the effects of flooding, whether from storm surges or excessive rainfall (Cooper and Peros 2010). In addition, the structures include large-diameter wooden posts driven vertically into the ground, upon which lighter structural material (including palm thatch) was placed to complete the walls and roof. While high winds and rain could easily destroy much of the exterior of these structures, those elements could quickly be replaced with locally procured materials following the hurricane event. Indeed, this kind of house architecture contrasts with today’s poorly constructed cement and brick buildings in the area, which, when damaged, require considerable effort with non-local materials to repair, making post-hurricane reconstruction time-consuming and costly (Cooper 2012). Thus, Los Buchillones serves as an example of pre-industrial adaptation to high-risk meteorological events—a proactive response–which would have enhanced cultural resilience in the face of extreme storms.
Although there is evidence for strategies consistent with hurricane adaptation at Los Buchillones, no paleotempestological research has been undertaken in this region of Cuba. Such work would strengthen the case for a proactive response to hurricane activity by the Taíno, and the numerous lagoons and mangroves that are common in the area likely preserve evidence of past hurricane events. For example, paleotempestology could provide data to help assess the extent to which the Archipiélago de Sabana-Camagüey protected the site from flooding during the period of Taíno occupation. Paleotempestological data from the lagoons located on the offshore islands (such as Cayo Coco) could be compared to similar data from the mainland—including the lagoon Los Buchillones is located in—to identify differences between hurricane impacts on the exposed, ocean-facing side of the reef compared to the protected mainland. In addition, these studies could help elucidate whether hurricane activity was more active during site occupation (~ 1220–1640 CE), which would provide additional evidence for the need for the adoption of adaptive strategies by the Taíno to reduce hurricane risk.
Conclusion
Each year, approximately eighty hurricanes occur across the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Oceans—a number that has changed little over the last few decades of hurricane monitoring (NOAA 2018). While not all of these storms make landfall, the widespread and frequent nature of high-magnitude meteorological events means they are a major agent influencing coastal environments and the human populations who reside there. Despite considerable efforts dedicated to hurricane forecasting and emergency preparedness, relatively little is still known about how these events impacted pre-industrial societies. Hurricane impacts are multifaceted and include high winds, rain, and flooding during the event itself, followed by flooding and occasionally fire activity after the storm dissipates or moves on. The review undertaken here highlights a range of past human responses to hurricanes that include near total destruction (the fleets of the Kublai Khan in medieval Japan), possible societal collapse due to a drought-induced reduction in hurricane activity (the ancient Maya), and the mitigation of impact through proactive adaptation measures (the Taíno at Los Buchillones, Cuba). The variability of the human response before, during, and after extreme weather events illustrates the fact that the concept of hurricanes as natural phenomena that overwhelm social and natural systems is simplistic and that their effects are influenced by cultural and historical factors as much as by the hurricane itself.
The growing field of paleotempestology has much to contribute to the question of hurricane impacts on past human societies. However, as this chapter shows, paleotempestological investigations must be conducted in close association with archaeological and/or historical research. For example, in the case of medieval Japan, the paleotempestological investigations were important for providing independent supporting evidence for typhoon strikes around the time of the Mongol invasions, but ultimately it was archaeological and historical evidence—in the form of sunken and destroyed ships, alongside historical records of these events—that helped confirm the human response. In the case of the ancient Maya, ongoing questions concerning the specific way hurricane activity impacted Maya society seem to be due as much to uncertainty in the nature of hurricane activity around the time of the Terminal Maya collapse as to generalizing about what kind of response would be expected from a society as large and complex as the Mayan civilization. While paleotempestological research has yet to be carried out in northern Cuba, it may be that establishing relationships between hurricanes and past societies is most effectively undertaken at the site and landscape level, such as at Los Buchillones, where there is potential to develop reliable and detailed reconstructions of past hurricane activity and where the scale of the human system is relatively small and less complex (compared to a state-level society).
Certainly, the increasing number of paleotempestological proxy records in development will fill geographic and temporal gaps that will help provide contexts for archaeological research. Another promising area of research is the use of large archaeological databases to explore regional-scale demographic shifts in pre-industrial populations and site location in response to hurricane activity gleaned from paleotempestological data (Oliva et al. 2017). Moreover, there may be potential for archaeological materials and the sites themselves to be used as indicators of past hurricane activity. For example, could preserved wood from sites such as Los Buchillones contain isotopic evidence of past hurricane strikes, in much the same way speleothems (Frappier et al. 2014) and tree rings (Miller et al. 2006) do? Is it possible for shells from coastal middens to provide very high-resolution isotopic records of past hurricane strikes (Komagoe et al. 2018)? Finally, to what extent can we learn and apply the lessons and examples of past human responses to ongoing and future hurricane mitigation in the face of climate change? This latter question is probably the most important of all, and innovative ways of incorporating traditional knowledge developed from long-term archaeological and geological perspectives should be essential for disaster management in coastal regions and a priority for the future (Cooper 2013).
References
Adger, W. Neil, Jon Barnet, Katrina Brown, Nadine Marshall, and Karen O’Brien. 2013. “Cultural Dimensions of Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation.” Nature Climate Change 3: 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1666.
Blake, Eric S. 2018. “The 2017 Atlantic Hurricane Season: Catastrophic Losses and Costs.” Weatherwise 71(3): 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00431672.2018.1448147.
Bloemendaal, Nadia, Ivan D. Haigh, Hans de Moel, Sanne Muis, Reindert J. Haarsma, and Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts. 2020. “Generation of a Global Synthetic Tropical Cyclone Hazard Dataset Using STORM.” Nature Scientific Data 7(40). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11733585.
Brown, Alyson L., Eduard G. Reinhardt, Peter J. van Hengstum, and Jessica E. Pilarczyk. 2014. “A Coastal Yucatan Sinkhole Records Intense Hurricane Events.” Journal of Coastal Research 30: 418–429. https://doi.org/10.2112/jcoastres-d-13-00069.1.
Bruins, Hendrik J., Johannes van der Plicht, and J. Alexander MacGillivray. 2009. “The Minoan Santorini Eruption and Tsunami Deposits in Palaikastro (Crete): Dating by Geology, Archaeology, 14C, and Egyptian Chronology.” Radiocarbon 51(2): 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003382220005579X.
Brunsma, David L., David Overfelt, and Steve Picou. 2007. The Sociology of Katrina: Perspectives on a Modern Catastrophe. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Burton, Ian, Robert W. Kates, and Gilbert F. White. 1978. The Environment as Hazard. New York: Oxford University Press.
Calvera Roses, Jorge, Roberto Valcárcel Rojas, and Jago Cooper. 2006. “Los Buchillones: Universo de Madera.” Revista de la Academia de Ciencias de la Republica Dominicana 3: 9–16.
Camargo, Suzana J. 2013. “Global and Regional Aspects of Tropical Cyclone Activity in the CMIP5 Models.” Journal of Climate 26(24): 9880–9902. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00549.1.
Cooper, Jago. 2012. “Fail to Prepare Then Prepare to Fail: Re-thinking Threat, Vulnerability and Mitigation in the Pre-Columbian Caribbean.” In Surviving Sudden Environmental Change: Answers from Archaeology, edited by Jago Cooper and Payson Sheets, 91–114. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.
Cooper, Jago. 2013. “Building Resilience in Island Communities: A Paleotempestological Perspective.” In Climates, Landscapes, and Civilizations: Geophysical Monograph Series 198, edited by Liviu Giosan, Dorian Q. Fuller, Kathleen Nicoll, Rowan K. Flad, and Peter D. Clift, 43–49. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.
Cooper, Jago, and Matthew Peros. 2010. “The Archaeology of Climate Change in the Caribbean.” Journal of Archaeological Science 37(6): 1226–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2009.12.022.
Corbosiero, Kristen L., and John Molinari. 2002. “The Effects of Vertical Wind Shear on the Distribution of Convection in Tropical Cyclones.” Monthly Weather Review 130: 2110–2123. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<2249:eovwso>2.0.co;2.
Curet, Luis Antonio. 1992. “House Structure and Cultural Change in the Caribbean: Three Case Studies from Puerto Rico.” Latin American Antiquity 3: 160–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/971942.
Delgado, James P. 2003. “Relics of the Kamikaze.” Archaeology 56: 36–41.
Delgado, James P. 2010. Kamikaze: History’s Greatest Naval Disaster. New York: Random House.
Deligne, N. I., S. G. Coles, and R. S. J. Sparks. 2010. “Recurrence Rates of Large Explosive Volcanic Eruptions.” Journal of Geophysical Research—Solid Earth 115. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB006554.
Denommee, Kathryn C., Samuel Jackson Bentley, and Andre Droxler. 2014. “Climatic Controls on Hurricane Patterns: A 1200-y Near Annual Record from Lighthouse Reef, Belize.” Scientific Reports 4(3876): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03876.
Donnelly, Jeffrey P., Sarah S. Bryant, Jessica Butler, Jennifer Dowling, Linda Fan, Neil Hausmann, Paige Newby, Bryan Shuman, Jennifer Stern, Karlyn Westover, and Thompson Webb III. 2001. “700 yr Sedimentary Record of Intense Hurricane Landfalls in Southern New England.” GSA Bulletin 113: 714–727. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2001)113<0714:YSROIH>2.0.CO;2.
Donnelly, Jeffrey P., Jessica Butler, Stuart Roll, Micah Wengren, and Thompson Webb III. 2004. “A Backbarrier Overwash Record of Intense Storms from Brigantine, New Jersey.” Marine Geology 210: 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2004.05.005.
Donnelly, Jeffrey P., Andrea D. Hawkes, Philip Lane, Dana MacDonald, Bryan N. Shuman, Michael R. Toomey, Peter J. van Hengstum, and Jonathan D. Woodruff. 2015. “Climate Forcing of Unprecedented Intense-Hurricane Activity in the Last 2000 Years.” Earth’s Future 3: 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014EF000274.
Donnelly, Jeffrey P., and Jonathan D. Woodruff. 2007. “Intense Hurricane Activity over the Past 5,000 Years Controlled by El Niño and the West African Monsoon.” Nature 447: 465–468. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05834.
Dull, Robert A., John R. Southon, and Payson Sheets. 2001. “Volcanism, Ecology and Culture: A Reassessment of the Volcán Ilopango TBJ Eruption in the Southern Maya Realm.” Latin American Antiquity 12(1): 25–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/971755.
Dunning, Nicholas P., Timothy P. Beach, and Sheryl Luzzader-Beach. 2012. “Kax and Kol: Collapse and Resilience in Lowland Maya Civilization.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 109: 3652–3657. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114838109.
Dunning, Nicholas P., and Stephen Houston. 2011. “Chan Ik’: Hurricanes as a Disruptive Force in the Maya Lowlands.” In Ecology, Power, and Religion in Maya Landscapes, edited by Christian Isendahl and Bodil Liljefors Persson, 57–68. Markt Schwaben, Germany: Verlag Anton Saurwein.
Emanuel, Kerry. 2003. “Tropical Cyclones.” Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science Letters 31: 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.31.100901.141259.
Florin, Paolo, and Christopher Gerrard. 2017. “The Archaeology of Earthquakes: The Application of Adaptive Cycles to Seismically-Affected Communities in Late Medieval Europe.” Quaternary International 446: 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.06.030.
Franklin, James L. 2008. “Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Dean.” https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL042007_Dean.pdf.
Frappier, Amy B., James Pyburn, Aurora D. Pinkey-Drobnis, Zianfeng Wang, D. Reide Corbett, and Bruce H. Dahlin. 2014. “Two Millennia of Tropical Cyclone-Induced Mud Layers in a Northern Yucatán Stalagmite: Multiple Overlapping Climatic Hazards during the Maya Terminal Classic ‘Megadroughts.’ ” Geophysical Research Letters 41: 5148–5157. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059882.
Frappier, Amy B., Dork Sahagian, Scott J. Carpenter, Luis A. González, and Brian R. Frappier. 2007. “Stalagmite Stable Isotope Record of Recent Tropical Cyclone Events.” Geology 35: 111–114. https://doi.org/10.1130/G23145A.1.
García-Herrera, Ricardo, Luis Gimeno, Pedro Ribera, Emiliano Hernández, Ester González, and Guadalupe Fernández. 2007. “Identification of Caribbean Basin Hurricanes from Spanish Documentary Sources.” Climatic Change 83: 55–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9124-4.
Goni, Gustavo, Mark Demaria, John A. Knaff, Charles Sampson, Isaac Ginis, Francis Bringas, Alberto Mavume, Chris Lauer, I.-I. Lin, M. M. Ali, Paul Sandery, Silvana Ramos-Buarque, Kiryong Kang, Avichal Mehra, Eric Chassignet, and George Halliwell. 2009. “Applications of Stellite-Derived Ocean Measurements to Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecasting.” Oceanography 22(3): 176–183. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2009.78.
Gunderson, Lance. 2010. “Ecological and Human Community Resilience in Response to Natural Disasters.” Ecology and Society 15(2): article 18.
Hallegatte, Stéphane, and Patrice Dumas. 2009. “Can Natural Disasters Have Positive Consequences? Investigating the Role of Embodied Technical Change.” Ecological Economics 68: 777–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.011.
Hellin, Jon, Martin Haigh, and Frank Marks. 1999. “Rainfall Characteristics of Hurricane Mitch.” Nature 399: 316. https://doi.org/10.1038/20577.
Hetzinger, Steffen, Miriam Pfeiffer, Wolf-Christian Dullo, Noel Keenlyside, Mojib Matif, and Jens Zinke. 2008. “Caribbean Coral Tracks Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation and Past Hurricane Activity.” Geology 36(1): 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1130/G24321A.1.
Hodell, David A., Jason H. Curtis, and Mark Brenner. 1995. “Possible Role of Climate in the Collapse of Classic Maya Civilization.” Nature 375(6530): 391–394. https://doi.org/10.1038/375391a0.
Holling, Crawford S., and Lance H. Gunderson. 2002. “Resilience and Adaptive Cycles.” In Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, edited by Crawford S. Holling and Lance H. Gunderson, 25–62. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Huang, Shih-Kai, Michael K. Lindell, Carla S. Prater, Hao-Che Wu, and Laura K. Siebeneck. 2012. “Household Evacuation Decision Making in Response to Hurricane Ike.” Natural Hazard Review 13: 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000074.
IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core writing team, R. K. Pachauri and L. A. Meyer (eds.)]. Geneva: IPCC.
Knapp, Kenneth R., Michael C. Kruk, David H. Levinson, Howard J. Diamond, and Charles J. Neumann. 2010. “The International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS) Unifying Tropical Cyclone Data.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 91: 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2755.1.
Knutson, Thomas R., John L. McBride, Johnny Chan, Kerry Emanuel, Greg Holland, Chris Landsea, Isaac Held, James P. Kossin, Alka K. Srivastava, and Masato Sugi. 2010. “Tropical Cyclones and Climate Change.” Nature Geoscience 3: 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo779.
Komagoe, Taro, Tsuyoshi Watanabe, Kotaro Shirai, Atsuko Yamazaki, and Mitsuo Uematu. 2018. “Geochemical and Microstructural Signals in Giant Clam Tridacna maxima Recorded Typhoon Events at Okinotori Island, Japan.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 123: 1460–1474. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JG004082.
Konrad, Herman W. 1985. “Fallout of the Wars of the Chacs: The Impact of Hurricanes and Implications for Pre-Hispanic Quintana Roo Maya Processes.” In Status, Structure, and Stratification: Current Archaeological Reconstructions, edited by Marc Thompson, Maria Teresa Garcia, and Francois J. Kense, 321–330. Calgary: University of Calgary.
Konrad, Herman W. 1996. “Caribbean Tropical Storms: Ecological Implications for Pre-Hispanic and Contemporary Maya Subsistence on the Yucatan Peninsula.” Revista de la Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán 224: 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1068/a39148.
Liu, Kam-biu. 2004. “Paleotempestology.” In Hurricanes and Typhoons: Past, Present, and Future, edited by R. J. Murnane and Kam-biu Liu, 13–57. New York: Columbia University Press.
Liu, Kam-biu, and Miriam Fearn. 2000. “Reconstruction of Prehistoric Landfall Frequencies of Catastrophic Hurricanes in Northwestern Florida from Lake Sediment Records.” Quaternary Research 54: 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1006/qres.2000.2166.
Liu, Kam-biu, Caiming Shen, and Kin-shen Louie. 2001. “A 1,000-Year History of Typhoon Landfalls in Guangdong, Southern China, Reconstructed from Chinese Historical Documentary Records.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91(3): 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00253.
McCloskey, T. A., and G. Keller. 2009. “5000 Year Sedimentary Record of Hurricane Strikes on the Central Coast of Belize.” Quaternary International 195: 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2008.03.003.
Medina-Elizalde, Martín, Josué Moises Polanco-Martínez, Fernanda Lases-Hernández, Raymond Bradley, and Stephen Burns. 2016. “Testing the ‘Tropical Storm’ Hypothesis of Yucatan Peninsula Climate Variability during the Maya Terminal Classic Period.” Quaternary Research 86: 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yqres.2016.05.006.
Medina-Elizalde, Martín, and Eelco J. Rohling. 2012. “Collapse of Classic Maya Civilization Related to Modest Reduction in Precipitation.” Science 335: 956–959. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1216629.
Merrell, William J., Lyssa Graham Reynolds, Andres Cardenas, Joshua R. Gunn, and Amie J. Hufton. 2011. “The Ike Dike: A Coastal Barrier Protecting the Houston/Galveston Region from Hurricane Storm Surge.” In Macro-Engineering Seawater in Unique Environments, edited by Viorel Badescu and Richard B. Cathcart, 691–716. Berlin: Springer.
Miller, Dana L., Claudia I. Mora, Henri D. Grissino-Mayer, Cary J. Mock, Maria E. Uhle, and Zachary Sharp. 2006. “Tree-Ring Isotope Records of Tropical Cyclone Activity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 103: 14294–14297. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606549103.
Muñoz, Samuel E., Kristine E. Gruley, Ashtin Massie, David A. Fike, Sissel Schroeder, and John W. Williams. 2015. “Cahokia’s Emergence and Decline Coincided with Shifts of Flood Frequency on the Mississippi River.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 112(20): 6319–6324. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1501904112.
Murty, T. S., R. A. Flather, and R. F. Henry. 1986. “The Storm Surge Problem in the Bay of Bengal.” Progress in Oceanography 16: 195–233.
NOAA [National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration]. 2018. “National Hurricane Center: Tropical Cyclone Climatology.” https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/climo/.
Oliva, Frank, Matthew Peros, and Andre Viau. 2017. “A Review of the Spatial Distribution of and Analytical Techniques Used in Paleotempestological Studies in the Western North Atlantic Basin.” Progress in Physical Geography 41: 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133316683899.
Pané, Fray Ramón. 1990. Relacion Acerca de las Antiguedades de los Indios. La Habana, Cuba: Ed. de Ciencias.
Peros, Matthew C., Elizabeth Graham, and Anthony M. Davis. 2006. “Stratigraphic Investigations at Los Buchillones, a Coastal Taino Site in North-Central Cuba.” Geoarchaeology 21: 403–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.20113.
Pielke, Roger A., Jose Rubiera, Christopher Landsea, Mario L. Fernández, and Roberta Klein. 2003. “Hurricane Vulnerability in Latin America and the Caribbean: Normalized Damage and Loss Potentials.” Natural Hazards Review 4(3): 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1061/ASCE1527-698820034:3101.
Reinhardt, Eduard G., Beverly N. Goodman, Joe I. Boyce, Gloria Lopez, Peter van Hengstum, W. Jack Rink, Yossi Mart, and Avner Raban. 2006. “The Tsunami of 13 December A.D. 115 and the Destruction of Herod the Great’s Harbor at Caesarea Maritima, Israel.” Geology 34(12): 1061–1064. https://doi.org/10.1130/G22780A.1.
Rivera-Collazo, Isabel C. 2019. “Severe Weather and the Reliability of Desk-Based Vulnerability Assessments: The Impact of Hurricane Maria to Puerto Rico’s Coastal Archaeology.” Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 15: 244–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2019.1570987.
Sandifer, Paul A., Landon C. Knapp, Tracy K. Collier, Amanda L. Jones, Robert-Paul Juster, Christopher R. Kelble, Richard K. Kwok, John V. Miglarese, Lawrence A. Palinkas, Dwayne E. Porter, Geoffrey I. Scott, Lisa M. Smith, William C. Sullivan, and Ariana E. Sutton-Grier. 2017. “A Conceptual Model to Assess Stress-Associated Health Effects of Multiple Ecosystem Services Degraded by Disaster Events in the Gulf of Mexico and Elsewhere.” Geohealth 1: 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GH000038.
Sasaki, Randall J. 2008. The Origin of the Lost Fleet of the Mongol Empire. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
Schwartz, Stuart B. 2015. Sea of Storms: A History of Hurricanes in the Caribbean from Columbus to Katrina. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Stein, Julia K. 1993. “Scale in Archaeology, Geosciences, and Geoarchaeology.” In Effects of Scale on Archaeological and Geoscientific Perspectives, edited by Julie K. Stein and Angela R. Linse, 1–10. Special Paper 10. Boulder: Geological Society of America.
Stewart, Mark G., David V. Rosowsky, and Zhigang Huang. 2003. “Hurricane Risks and Economic Viability of Strengthened Construction.” Natural Hazards Review 4(1): 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:1(12).
Trouet, Valerie, Grant Harley, and Marta Domínguez-Delmás. 2016. “Shipwreck Rates Reveal Caribbean Tropical Cyclone Response to Past Radiative Forcing.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 113(12): 3169–3174. doi:10.1073/pnas.1519566113.
Valcárcel Rojas, Roberto, Jago Cooper, J. Calvera Rosés, O. Brito, and Marcos Labrada. 2006. “Postes en el Mar: Excavación de una estructura constructiva aborigen en Los Buchillones.” El Caribe Arqueológico 9: 76–88.
Wallace, Davin J., Jon Woodruff, John B. Anderson, and Jeffrey P. Donnelly. 2014. “Palaeohurricane Reconstructions from Sedimentary Archives along the Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean Sea and Western North Atlantic Ocean Margins.” In Sedimentary Coastal Zones from High to Low Latitudes: Similarities and Differences, edited by I. P. Martini and E. R. Wanless, 481–501. London: Geological Society.
Woodruff, Jonathan D., Jeffrey P. Donnelly, David Mohrig, and Wayne R. Geyer. 2008. “Reconstructing Relative Flooding Intensities Responsible for Hurricane-Induced Deposits from Laguna Playa Grande, Vieques, Puerto Rico.” Geology 36: 391–394. doi:10.1130/G24731A.1.
Woodruff, J. D., K. Kanamaru, S. Kundu, and T. L. Cook. 2014. “Depositional Evidence for the Kamikaze Typhoons and Links to Changes in Typhoon Climatology.” Geology 43(1): 91–94. https://doi.org/10.1130/G36209.1.